Ahlulbayt News Agency: The ceasefire proposal for Gaza put forward by US President Donald Trump has so far yielded no results, and Zionist extremists are not cooperating with the process.
"Bezalel Smotrich," the Finance Minister of the Zionist regime, similar to "Itamar Ben-Gvir," the regime's National Security Minister, criticized the American plan for Gaza, stating that it does not serve the regime's interests and that Gaza must be attacked.
The Zionist regime's Finance Minister also opposed the proposed plan by US President "Donald Trump" for administering Gaza, saying: We must inform Trump that his plan for Gaza is bad for "Israel."
Previously, "Itamar Ben-Gvir," the Zionist regime's National Security Minister, also supported the statement from the office of "Benjamin Netanyahu," the regime's Prime Minister, opposing the "formation of a Gaza administrative committee without coordination with Israel and contrary to its policies."
Netanyahu's office had earlier issued a harsh statement criticizing Trump and his plan for Gaza, emphasizing that the announcement of forming an executive committee for Gaza was made without coordination with Israel and contradicts its policies.
Donald Trump's ceasefire proposal did not halt the course of the war in Gaza, and the extremist Zionists' opposition to another proposal by the US President for administering Gaza is also a sign of their dissatisfaction with ending the war.
Recent developments in Gaza have once again shown that the core issue in the sinister objectives of the Zionist regime is not security, nor diplomacy, but rather a racist and expansionist project that Zionist extremist factions are striving with all their might to achieve.
For Zionist extremist factions, a ceasefire is neither a humanitarian necessity nor a step towards regional stability, but rather a threat to the continuity of occupation, which nullifies their plans and ideas for the complete occupation of Palestine. Extremist factions in Tel Aviv, from a security perspective, view any ceasefire or international political plan as a threat to their long-term goals.
From the perspective of extremist Zionists, the formation of a Gaza administrative committee without coordination with Tel Aviv is a dangerous step towards reducing the influence of the Israeli regime and increasing the role of external actors.
The sharp reaction from Netanyahu's office also showed that even the Zionist regime's cabinet is unwilling to relinquish the management of Gaza to any international mechanism; but for extremist factions, this sensitivity is far more intense.
At the domestic level, the continuation of the war is a political position for Smotrich and Ben-Gvir, and their voter base—primarily composed of settlers and Zionist extremist groups—sees the war not as a crisis, but as a tool to achieve their own goals. In such an atmosphere, a ceasefire could be portrayed as "surrender" and weaken their political standing.
The Zionist extremists are well aware that a ceasefire, and subsequently a halt to military operations, will shift conditions in favor of Palestinian resistance forces, and that the leaders of the Zionist regime will also have to be held accountable for their crimes in Gaza.
The opposition of extremist Zionists to a ceasefire in Gaza is not a temporary reaction, but part of their long-term strategy to perpetuate the occupation and prevent the formation of any independent Palestinian political structure.
Resolving the Gaza crisis is also impossible without preventing the destructive actions of Zionist extremist factions, without serious pressure from the international community to stop the Israeli regime's expansionist policies, and without supporting the legitimate demands of the Palestinian people.
/129
Your Comment